Category: Crop System Suitability

Merced River Flood-MAR Reconnaissance Study Technical Memorandum 1 Plan of Study – Draft

DWR, in partnership with the Merced Irrigation District (MID), is conducting a preliminary study using flood waters for managed aquifer recharge that can reduce flood risk, increase surface and groundwater supply reliability, and enhance ecosystems in the Merced River Basin. This Merced River Reconnaissance Study (study) is exploring the potential, feasibility, and effectiveness of Flood-MAR concepts, testing theories, and assessing strategies in overcoming barriers and challenges to project planning and implementation. The study will assess current conditions of the Merced River watershed and the vulnerability of these watershed management characteristics to a range of potential climate change futures. The study will also describe the public and private benefits that may be achieved through Flood-MAR strategies and quantify a range of benefits that Flood-MAR could provide in or adjacent to the Merced River watershed.

Introduction to Groundwater Recharge

The Central Valley is one of the most productive agricultural regions in the United States. Growers and communities, however, are faced with a future of declining groundwater quality, quantity, and availability during drought, due to overdraft. In areas where soil conditions are suitable and excess water is available, ground water recharge represents one of the most cost-effective methods to increase storage, thereby ensuring water supply and improving water quality. Through this guide, California almond growers can begin evaluating their options for addressing local sub-basin overdraft through recharge, helping secure reliable, sufficient, and drought resilient groundwater supplies.

Management Considerations for Protecting Groundwater Quality Under Agricultural Managed Aquifer Recharge

Unsustainable groundwater use in California – due in large part to historical over-pumping of aquifer systems, growing reliance on groundwater to meet irrigation and urban water demands, and increasing frequency of drought – affects all water users and threatens agricultural viability into the future, but has disproportionately impacted disadvantaged communities and jeopardizes their access to safe, clean and affordable water. To secure the availability of groundwater for all uses, the state enacted the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) in 2014. Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) were charged with developing Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSPs) to avoid undesirable effects of ongoing groundwater depletion. To meet these goals, many GSPs include managed aquifer recharge (MAR) as one of several key tools to improve groundwater sustainability.

Agricultural Managed Aquifer Recharge (AgMAR) is the act of intentionally flooding fallow, dormant, or active cropland when excess surface water is available. AgMAR has the potential to be a cost-effective and high impact form of MAR due to the large acreage of cropland throughout California. As more farmers adopt AgMAR, there is greater urgency to understand the potential water quality risks and benefits associated with recharge. While pesticides and geogenic contaminants such as arsenic pose additional water quality concerns in MAR projects, this paper focuses specifically on water quality considerations for nitrate and salts related to AgMAR activities.

Nitrate contamination of groundwater is expected to worsen into the future. However, a combination of improved nutrient management and carefully implemented AgMAR projects could improve groundwater quality faster than under business as usual. Improvements in nitrogen management practices should be prioritized to reduce current and future nitrogen (N) loading to groundwater. Furthermore, relatively clean (nitrate free) recharge water (e.g. high magnitude flood flows) should be used during AgMAR events in order to dilute incoming and existing nitrate in groundwater. AgMAR programs should prioritize sites that can recharge in longer-duration single-flooding events, such as sandier sites, to capitalize on the dilution effect and reduce biologically mediated mineralization of organic N (the conversion of organic N to nitrate).

AgMAR alone will not lead to substantive improvement in groundwater quality with respect to nitrate without concomitant improvements in current agronomic nitrogen management and sufficient water for dilution. The development of transparent and easy-to-use tools that estimate the amount of residual nitrate at the end of a growing season, the amount of water needed to dilute nitrate under AgMAR, and time of travel to groundwater will help in the successful implementation of recharge projects to avoid negative water quality externalities. Current nitrogen loading maps and locations of drinking water supply wells can be used by GSAs to get a sense of regional nitrogen loading to groundwater and help in planning and prioritizing efforts on sites to target for AgMAR.

Protecting Groundwater Quality While Replenishing Aquifers

This document represents a first step towards management guidance for on-farm recharge planners and practitioners to maximize benefits to water quality and to manage risks under AgMAR. This document is also intended to be used as a resource for communities so they can more fully participate in the GSA decision-making process.

The intent of this management brief is to build understanding of how drinking water could be affected by AgMAR and identify management considerations that can be used to design AgMAR projects that are mindful of water quality. These considerations are neither prescriptive nor meant to cover the full scope of considerations needed to implement a successful recharge project or program (i.e., analysis of soil and crop suitability, hydrogeology, water rights and availability, and conveyance infrastructure, among other topics).

Protegiendo la Calidad del Agua Subterranea Mientras se Reponen los Acuiferos

Este documento representa un primer paso hacia la guía de manejo para los administradores y profesionales de la recarga a nivel parcela para maximizar los beneficios para la calidad del agua y manejar los riesgos bajo Ag-MAR. Este documento también está destinado a ser utilizado como un recurso para que las comunidades puedan participar más plenamente en el proceso de toma de decisiones de la GSA.

La intención de este informe de manejo es desarrollar la comprensión de cómo Ag-MAR podría afectar el agua potable e identificar las consideraciones de manejo que se pueden utilizar para diseñar proyectos Ag-MAR que tengan en cuenta la calidad del agua. Estas consideraciones no son prescriptivas ni pretenden cubrir el alcance completo de las consideraciones necesarias para implementar un proyecto o programa de recarga exitosa (es decir, análisis de cultivos adecuados de suelos y cultivos, hidrogeología, derechos y disponibilidad de agua e infraestructura de flujo, entre otros temas).

On the risk of pesticide residue leaching under agricultural managed aquifer recharge

In collaboration with the California Department of Pesticide Regulation this project is assessing pesticide residue leaching in response to agricultural groundwater recharge. To evaluate the risk of pesticide residue leaching we conducted 1) a towed Transient ElectroMagnetic (towTEM) geophysical survey to characterize sediment types in the deep vadose zone underlying the recharge site; 2) we flooded an 8 acre section of a fallow field for 8 days and monitored pesticide residue concentrations in soil cores, groundwater, and soil pore water before, during, and after the recharge experiment; 3) we performed a potassium bromide tracer test during the recharge experiment to measure solute travel time and breakthrough in nearby monitoring wells; and 4) we are in the process of developing a pesticide fate and transport model for the soil root and deep vadose zones underlying the recharge site using data collected from the study. The experiment was conducted at Terranova Ranch near Helm, CA. The soil at the site is characterized by sandy loams and loamy sands with a cemented duripan at around 1 m depth in some areas (Bachand et al., 2014). The experimental site was flooded in February 2021 using pumped groundwater. In total 38,774 m3 recharge water was applied at a flow rate of ~885 gallon/min; the total infiltration was 1.2 m. Sensors were installed at 0.2, 0.6, 1, 1.75 and 2.5 m at three locations within the flooded area and two locations in the non-flooded (i.e., control). At each sensor profile soil moisture, EC, temperature, gaseous O2, and redox potential were measured and pore water samples were taken from suction cups. CO2 and N2O emissions, ponding levels, pore water, and sediments were sampled too.

In the flooded area, sensor data showed a fast increase to near-saturated conditions within about one day. During the recharge, the shallow vadose zone at the three profiles remained in oxic conditions, except at the shallowest depths of 0.2 and 0.6 m. Pore water results showed that legacy nitrate concentrations were above MCL before flooding, reaching up to 600 mg/L in profile #3 at 0.2 m. During flooding, a large fraction of the initial soil nitrate was leached below 2.5 m, but nitrate was not fully flushed from the first 2.5 m of the vadose zone since nitrate concentrations during- and post- flooding were still above zero in most locations in Terranova. Ammonium concentrations were generally very low and showed no significant changes pre- and post-flooding. Prior, during and after flooding detectable concentrations of several pesticide residues could be measured in soil and pore water samples including imidacloprid, Metolachlor, thiamethoxam, methoxyfenozide and azoxystrobin. Some of these residues showed a clear leaching trend over the course of the experiment, indicating mobilization and dilution. Analysis of the field-collected pesticide residue data is still ongoing.

Soil Agricultural Groundwater Banking Index

The Soil Agricultural Groundwater Banking Index (SAGBI) is a suitability index for groundwater recharge on agricultural land. The SAGBI is based on five major factors that are critical to successful agricultural groundwater banking: deep percolation, root zone residence time, topography, chemical limitations, and soil surface condition.

Flood-MAR Research and Data Development Plan

This Flood-MAR Research and Data Development Plan (R&DD Plan) presents the work of the Flood-MAR Research Advisory Committee (RAC), a multidisciplinary group of subject matter experts across 13 research themes. The RAC was tasked to identify the research, data, guidance, and tools necessary to support and expand the implementation of Flood-MAR projects. Well-formulated Flood-MAR projects can benefit Californians and the environment through improved water supply reliability, flood-risk reduction, drought preparedness, aquifer replenishment, ecosystem enhancement, subsidence mitigation, water quality improvement, working landscape preservation and stewardship, climate change adaptation, recreation, and aesthetics

Flood-MAR White Paper

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) prepared this white paper to explore opportunities to use flood water for managed aquifer recharge (Flood-MAR) because DWR recognizes the need to rehabilitate and modernize water and flood infrastructure in California. Large-scale implementation of Flood-MAR can fundamentally change how flood and groundwater management are integrated by using flood water resulting from, or in anticipation of, rainfall or snowmelt for groundwater recharge on agricultural lands and working landscapes, including but not limited to refuges, floodplains, and flood bypasses.